What's Good for the Goose...

I borrowed this post from Wake Up America. Kudos for posting it so I could share the news. I encourage anyone reading this to check out the rest of the comments on Wake Up America.

Try walking about without a passport in the middle eastern countries. You might find yourself jailed for life, or even worse, beheaded. What about illegal immigrants are people missing in Arizona's new law? No one wants to deport U.S. citizens, so get a grip. If you can prove you're here legally, then you have no worries. It's no different than passing through the scanner at the airport and being pulled aside to determine you aren't a terrorism threat to the country. It happens to all of us at one time or another. Put on your big girl or boy pants and stop sniveling. The Democrats have whipped this into a fury about freedoms and rights that has nothing to do with citizens.

I'm happy that others are taking a stand and not leaving Arizona out to dry as California has, and I'm sad that Tennessee is not among the states listed in the fight. I propose that we give California back to Mexico. If the state is so opposed to deportation and threatens Arizona with boycotts, that pretty much explains why they drove their own state into Bankruptcy. It's a well-known fact that the majority of farm laborers in that state are in the U.S. illegally and that the legislators there are mostly morons. Yep, born and raised in California, and happy not to be there.

Arizona Does Not Stand Alone On Immigration Law- 17 Other States Join Fight

Posted: 23 May 2010 10:20 AM PDT

Mens News Daily and WND report that 17 other states are joining with Arizona in the battle against illegal immigrations.

Mens News daily:


First, President Barack Obama allowed Calderon to slam American citizens in Arizona over the new immigration enforcement law and then Obama openly agreed with Calderon statements that denigrated patriotic Americans.


Later, when Calderon lectured lawmakers on the floor of the U.S. Senate about Arizona’s immigration policy, the man known as “the Mexican moocher” — because of the billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars he receives yearly – was given a standing ovation by members of the Obama administration and Democrat members of both houses of Congress.


Two Obama cabinet members — Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Attorney General Eric Holder — stood and enthusiastically applauded Calderon’s arrogant speech. It should be noted that both of these members of the Obama national security team admitted they failed to read a law that they felt qualified to bash repeatedly.


Meanwhile, one of America’s national organizations fighting against illegal immigration announced Friday that 17 additional U.S. states are now filing versions of Arizona’s SB 1070 law which is designed to help local police enforce America’s existing immigration laws.


Sadly, on Friday the Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, John Morton, says he will not deport any illegal aliens referred to his office by Arizona police officers or sheriff’s deputies.
Numerous national and local polls indicated that 60-81% of Americans support local police enforcing immigration laws.

“Our national network of activists have been working overtime trying to help the state of Arizona and the brave Arizonans who have passed this bill,” said William Gheen, President of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC. “Arizona no longer stands alone and we have now documented state lawmakers filing, or announcing they will file, versions of the Arizona bill in seventeen states! We will not stop until all states are protected from invasion as required by the US Constitution.”

The 17 states claiming to be joining Arizona’s fight against criminal aliens – as well as corrupt Mexican politicians or criminals serving in Mexican police or military forces — are as follows:

ARKANSAS, IDAHO, INDIANA, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEBRASKA, NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA, TEXAS, UTAH

What's Wrong With This Picture

A thousand students from various high schools in  the Southern California area of Montebello marched in protest to the new Arizona Immigration laws.  I suppose this is a summary of what they think they are protesting.  It's a well known-fact that California hosts a predominant Hispanic population, but this is outrageous.  If people truly feel that the Mexican flag needs to be flown, then why don't they go live in Mexico instead of mocking the freedoms of this country.  Of course one student in particular was fingered for the "crime," but the fact that onlookers stood by and did nothing speaks volumes about what our children are learning in school about America and what a great country this is.

Check out this set of Immigration laws:

1.  There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
  

  2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.

  3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
  

  4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
  

  5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.

  6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs. Any burden will be deported.

 

  7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
 
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
 
9. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
 
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted &, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All assets will be taken from you.

Too strict?

The above laws are current immigration laws of MEXICO !

Welcome to the USA - Funny

Where Are We Headed?

What next folks?  Before you read this article I "blogjacked", let me preface this ridiculous proposal by suggesting that perhaps the money would better be spent on trying to eliminate or at least reduce the number of perverts in our country that keep our children housebound.  When I grew up, we played outside, went trick-or-treating alone, and had free rein without fear of being abducted, molested or murdered.  I would never allow my grandchild to be alone outside just because I'm one of those people who don't believe "it can never happen to me."  Think there aren't demented people in your own neighborhood?  Check out this site and enter your address.  Now, on to another foolish waste of money.  Let's hope Mr. Kind didn't reproduce.

Ron Kind (D-WI-3) Wants The Government To Track How Much Your Daughter Weighs

The Federal Fat Police Are Watching

Posted by Dan McLaughlin (Profile)

Thursday, May 13th at 7:15PM EDT

Hey, remember when we conservatives said that if you let the federal government into everybody’s healthcare, pretty soon it will stick its peering eyes and groping hands into our personal business?
Welcome to “pretty soon,” thanks to Wisconsin Democrat Ron Kind.
Kind has introduced a bill that would commandeer your health insurer to report to the federal government the body mass index (BMI) - i.e., height and weight - of your children every year from age 2 to 18:

States receiving federal grants provided for in the bill would be required to annually track the Body Mass Index of all children ages 2 through 18. The grant-receiving states would be required to mandate that all health care providers in the state determine the Body Mass Index of all their patients in the 2-to-18 age bracket and then report that information to the state government. The state government, in turn, would be required to report the information to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for analysis.
The Healthy Choices Act–introduced by Rep. Ron Kind (D-Wis.), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee….amends the Public Health Services Act by stating that health care providers must record the Body Mass Index of all children ages 2 through 18. “The provision relates to all children in states that accept grants under the bill,” a spokesperson for Rep. Kind told CNSNews.com. “….BMI will be taken at times when the child makes an otherwise scheduled doctor’s visit.”

Let’s leave aside the many methodological problems with BMI as a measurement of obesity (such as the fact that muscular, athletic males are almost always classed as obese). The bill requires federal taxpayers to lay out yet more money to create yet another intrusive apparatus for tracking and storing information that, for example, your 16 year old daughter might regard as rather personal:

To pay for implementing BMI data gathering, Sec. 102 of the bill states that the federal government will give grants to states that meet certain criteria, including having “the capacity to store basic demographic information (including date of birth, gender and geographic area of residence), height, weight, and immunization data for each resident of the state.”
The grants also will pay for personnel and equipment necessary to measure patients’ BMI.

And naturally, any child with a BMI over a specified percentile will be nagged to get government help. Of course, Rep. Kind swears that “any data used to generate a report on the BMI data collected would not include patients’ names,” but even if the data-security provisions are foolproof in that regard, there’s still going to be an awful lot of identifiable information that will be required to be stored in government databases. And passed on to “Congress and other government officials, including the secretaries of education and agriculture,” for that matter. The same people who go into shrieking tizzies at the idea of requiring adults to show a valid driver’s licenses as proof of citizenship if they get stopped for traffic violations want to create a gigantic database of children’s physical proportions. This is, by the way, the same Ron Kind whose GOP opponent in 2006 went after his history of supporting, uh, interesting government studies:

The ad states Kind doesn’t have a problem spending money per se, but that “he would just rather spend it on sex.” The ad then details-with citations to various NIH grants-legislation Kind is said to have voted for that included funds to:
1. Study the sex lives of Vietnamese prostitutes.
2. Study the masturbation habits of old men.
3. Study the bisexual, transgendered, and two-spirited Aleutian Eskimos.
4. Pay teenage girls to watch pornographic movies with probes connected to their genitalia.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is government without limits or a sense of personal space. It’s Michelle Obama’s and Ron Kind’s America.